*001240937
*00520190626150836.0
*007ta
*008140701s2014    no            000 0 eng
*00901734cam a2200433 c 4500
*015  $a1411116$2nbf
*019  $bl
*020  $qh.
*035  $a(EXLNZ-47BIBSYS_NETWORK)991400028474702201
*035  $a(NO-LaBS)14980051(bibid)
*035  $a(NO-TrBIB)140002847
*035  $a140002847-47bibsys_network
*040  $aNO-OsNB$bnob$ekatreg
*042  $anorbibl
*044  $cno
*08204$a878$qNoBeU$223
*08274$a874$qNO-OsNB$25/nor
*1001 $aØstmoe, Tor Ivar$d1970-$0(NO-TrBIB)70811$4aut$_23638100
*24510$aPoeta noster :$ban analysis of discussions of conjectures in the Horatian commentaries of Lambin (1561 and -67), Bentley (1711), and Peerlkamp (1834 and -62)$cTor Ivar Østmoe
*260  $aOslo$bUniversity of Oslo, Faculty of Humanities$c2014
*300  $a200 s.
*502  $aAvhandling (ph.d.) - Universitetet i Oslo, 2014
*60017$aBentley, Richard$d1662-1742$0(NO-TrBIB)90200195$2bare$_49511400
*60017$aHofman Peerlkamp, Petrus$d1786-1865$0(NO-TrBIB)2003874$2bare$_49511500
*60017$aHoratius Flaccus, Quintus$d-65--8$0(NO-TrBIB)90055203$2bare$_16852900
*60017$aLambin, Denis$d1516-1572$0(NO-TrBIB)90788825$2bare$_49511600
*650 7$aEdisjonsteknikk$0(NO-TrBIB)HUME06633$2humord$_186250500
*650 7$aFilologer$0(NO-TrBIB)HUME07429$2humord$_187899100
*650 7$aFilologi$0(NO-TrBIB)HUME04475$2humord$_187800700
*650 7$aKlassisk filologi$0(NO-TrBIB)HUME11499$2humord$_186712200
*650 7$aKommentar$0(NO-TrBIB)HUME18871$2humord$_188318400
*650 7$aLatinsk filologi$0(NO-TrBIB)HUME15668$2humord$_188318500
*650 7$aLatinsk litteratur$0(NO-TrBIB)HUME06936$2humord$_186412200
*653  $ahorace$ahoratius$_49511900
*7102 $aUniversitetet i Oslo$bDet humanistiske fakultet$0(NO-TrBIB)5038483$4dgg$_10354000
*901  $a90
*913  $aNorbok$bNB
*917  $ad
*999  $aoai:nb.bibsys.no:991400028474702202$b2021-11-14T20:00:01Z$z991400028474702202
^